Beyond the 49th Parallel: Barriers to the Future of U.S.-Canada Relations

This paper was written by Inna Vladimirovna Osetrova for IWP 670: Counter-Terror through Full Spectrum Cultural Engagement with Professor Albert Santoli.

“In our chaotic and dangerous world, the United States needs every reliable ally available. Whether in diplomacy, intelligence assessments, or shared national defense, in-depth and realistic understanding of our neighbors is essential. In IWP 670, Counter-Terror through Full Spectrum Cultural Engagement, our class team focused on U.S. relations with Canada. In our Full Spectrum exploration of North America’s similar-but-different cultures, we found differences that could determine the strength of our mutual survival. In this paper, IWP student and cultural intelligence team member, Inna Osetrova, explains some of those critical traits.”

— Professor Al Santoli

Introduction

Canada and the United States share a complex history of mutually beneficial relations that, in the 21st century, continue to influence each other’s national survival and security. Long before the establishment of the thirteen American colonies, the two neighbors maintained strong but separate relations across their 5,500-mile border, with treaties expanding trade and collaboration in response to financial hardship. While Canada’s British and French-speaking regions are distinct in their history and culture, they share common interests through natural resources and trade revenue. Today, the critical issues of border security, Arctic competition, drug crisis, and underground banking transcend provincial lines and directly impact the security of the United States. To contextualize these challenges, this paper aims to examine historical, economic, demographic, cultural, and political data across Canada’s Eastern Maritime (Newfoundland and Labrador, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia), Central (Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba), and Western (Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia) provinces to illuminate structural gaps in policy, bilateral interactions, trade, and security cooperation that will redefine the future of U.S.-Canadian relations.

Section I: Historical and Political Foundations of U.S.-Canada Relations

The historical heritage of the U.S. and Canada shows that two distinct moral philosophies have been embedded in the formation of their respective governments, beginning in the colonial era of America and Canada. The American Revolution renounced monarchy, religious persecution, and taxation, subsequently creating the moral foundation that led to the creation of the constitutional republic, inspired by the principles of liberty and individual freedom.

At this time, Canada was a dominion, a self-governing entity under the British Crown. Canada became a parliamentary democracy that prioritized state authority over revolutionary upheaval. While the U.S. focused on the separation of powers into executive, legislative, and judicial branches, Canada embraced constitutional monarchy, wherein “the Monarch is the Head of State and the Prime Minister is the Head of Government” (Parliament: An Overview, n.d.). This divergence becomes even more pronounced upon the examination of federal structures: the United States is a decentralized federation that reserves powers for individual states, while Canada’s constitution assigns authority explicitly to provinces, leaving residual powers to Parliament (Kramer, 2024). Ironically, both countries faced significant shifts in Federalism.

The U.S. Constitution explicitly separates federal and state powers, focusing on states’ individual rights and freedoms. In contrast, Canada adopted a more centralized federal model where provinces hold limited autonomy, with residual powers remaining under federal jurisdiction (Field, 1992, p. 111). For instance, while provinces manage healthcare and education, the federal government retains control over national defense and foreign policy.

The historical link of Canada with Britain also affected its approach to social policies. Unlike the U.S., encouraging immigrants to conform to American values, Canada has been embracing a policy of official multiculturalism, making linguistic and cultural diversity central to the national identity. This stance gives rise to greater funding of policies promoting cultural festivals and support for minority language education. To highlight this difference, the American Bill of Rights emphasizes individual liberties against government overreach. The 1982 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in contrast, prioritizes protections for minority groups and linguistic rights, focusing on “preservation and enhancement of the multicultural heritage” (Norman-Eady, 1998). Thus, Canada’s preference for stability over revolutionary change, shaped by its distinct governance traditions, has grown increasingly tenuous in the face of emerging threats.

Following the Royal Proclamation of 1763, where France assimilated the French-Canadian population under English rule in the secession of Quebec’s territory to the British, the British issued the 1775 Quebec Act to restore French property and religious freedom for Catholics (Hall, 2007). However, the British Americans of New England deemed the policies within the act “intolerable” and caused dissolution among the Americans and the British in Canada, driving the former closer to the Revolution (Canada and the American Revolution n.d.).

Half a century after the Revolutionary War (1776-1782), the Rebellion of 1837 in Lower Canada erupted as a result of the French-Canadian farmers’ economic depression. In the early 1800s, a group of liberal elites in Lower Canada established a predominantly French-speaking political movement named the Patriotes, under the leadership of Louis-Joseph Papineau, in what is now Quebec (Buckner, 2013). While the party’s demand—the autonomy of revenue in the Lower Canadian colonies—was not met by the end of the rebellion, the American-Canadian border collaboration to combat the British broke the political impasse of the mid-1830s (Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations, n.d.). By the 1850s, economic growth boomed due to the Industrial Revolution, the St. Lawrence River Canal expansion, and new transportation routes connecting Quebec City, Montreal, Toronto, and the U.S. by rail (Foot, 2006).

Trust between neighbors has been enhanced by respect for the rule of law. Building upon these early commercial patterns, formal treaties in the 19th century further deepened the economic interdependence between the two nations. The Canadian fur industry played a foundational role in early relations between future Canada and the United States. British-chartered trading enterprises like the Hudson’s Bay Company and the North West Company, competed with French traders, notably the coureurs de bois, and Indigenous groups like the Cree, Huron, and Algonquin (Library of Congress, n.d.). Early American traders viewed Canadian partners both as commercial rivals and intermediaries. The Jay Treaty of 1794 sought to normalize trade and border issues after the American Revolution, particularly addressing cross-border fur trading rights (Longley, 2020). However, the persistent competition and perception of British favoritism left early U.S.–Canada relations marked by distrust.

The western frontier of Canada also historically interacted with Alaska and the broader Pacific Northwest. Before the purchase of Alaska, Russian America had established trading networks extending into the coastal territories, present day British Columbia. Californian Fort Ross was a primary Russian base, the transit point, intended to supply Alaska’s colonies. Moreover, the Bering Strait served not only as a critical logistical corridor for Indigenous peoples but also as a geostrategic chokepoint (Laird, 2018). Canadian officials expressed frustrations because the British side did not consult Canadian interests upon the purchase of Alaska, illustrating its peripheral status amidst imperial negotiations.

It is important to note that the historical ties of Canada and Russia extended beyond the territory of Alaska. Though indirect, commercial and survivalist ties existed between Russia’s Pacific outposts, such as Vladivostok, and the emerging ports of British Columbia. As northern frontier societies, both Canada and Russia shared the struggle of large territories, harsh climates, and the challenge of asserting nationalism and sovereignty in sparsely populated lands. This socio-psychological reality, to a certain extent, may have influenced their later cautious approaches to the Arctic region.

Speaking on Pacific dimension, Canada was also involved in trade with China through the maritime fur trade. Sea otter pelts from the Pacific Northwest, for example, were the commodity of high value for the Chinese (Giráldéz & Richard, 2023). British and American merchants frequently navigated through those coastal waters to procure pelts to exchange for Chinese tea, silk, and porcelain. The establishment of these trade channels marked one of Canada’s earliest integrations into global commerce, tying its western regions not only to London and Boston but also to the trading ports of Asia.

Section II: Economic Interdependence and Regional Profiles

Throughout history, treaties between the United States and Canada have played an important role in advancing mutual trade and economic prosperity, strengthening cross-border cooperation, and deepening the connection between the two nations. As the markets declined during the Industrial Revolution, Canadians sought to benefit from increased trade. The 1854 Reciprocity Treaty with the U.S. opened access to American markets, with the treaty introducing free trade by eliminating tariffs on grain, meats, produce, coal, timber, and lumber, linking the Canadian economy more closely to the U.S. (Cronin, 2015). However, in 1866, the U.S. terminated the Reciprocity Treaty, which prompted Canada to pursue better economic relations with other North American territories (Maurice, 2006).

Moving into the 20th century, Canada had an opportunity to pursue various avenues of economic prosperity through its closest neighbor. The Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA) came into effect in 1989 and marked a substantial transformation in trade relations by eliminating tariffs and reducing non-tariff barriers with the United States. In 1994, CUSFTA was superseded by the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and in 2020, by the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) (Canada, 2025) (Goddeeris, 2021).

These agreements resulted in U.S.-Canada collaborations that were consistent and mutually beneficial, particularly in the East. Provinces such as Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Quebec have relied heavily on extracting, processing, and exporting fish, timber, and crude oil. In 2022, these goods accounted for approximately 33% of the GDP and almost 60% of exports in Newfoundland & Labrador (Newfoundland Labrador (CAN) Exports, Imports, and Trade Partners | the Observatory of Economic Complexity, n.d.). Of those goods exported, approximately 82% reach international markets, with the United States being the main partner. These regions collectively account for about 27% of Canada’s total GDP.

Nova Scotia’s top revenue-generating goods are gasoline and petroleum products, followed by the strong commercial banking sector (Nova Scotia (CAN) Exports, Imports, and Trade Partners…, n.d.). New Brunswick has developed its trade foundation in refined petroleum products, crustaceans, and wood (New Brunswick (CAN) Exports, Imports, and Trade Partners…,n.d). According to the 2023 Annual Hydro Report, Quebec is the largest electricity producer in Canada, with a generating capacity of 36,068 megawatts, which more than 30% of the total Canadian GDP (Hydro-Québec, 2014). In addition, for over a century, Canada and the U.S. have collaborated on consumer electricity agreements through powerlines that cross their border (Hernandez, 2025).

In Western and Central Canada (Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia), approximately 35% of Canada’s GDP shapes the nation’s trade with the United States. Agriculture remains their economic foundation, with Saskatchewan and Manitoba serving as major producers of wheat and dairy products. Alberta’s oil sands and British Columbia’s hydroelectric power sustain Canada’s energy exports. Vancouver became a major technological hub, often referred to as the “Silicon Valley North” (Government of Canada, 2021).

While Eastern Canada has historically been reliant on natural resource exports, the economic landscape of Central Canada, particularly Alberta, is defined mainly by its oil and gas industries. Its capital, Edmonton, plays an important economic role, comprising nearly 23% of the province’s GDP. As a center for industrial activity and energy production, Alberta is crucial to Canada’s overall economic output. The oil sands in northern Alberta contribute billions of dollars to the Canadian economy while supporting both local energy consumption and exports. With critical infrastructure like the Keystone XL Pipeline facilitating energy exports, this sector not only drives Alberta’s economic engine but also strengthens Canada’s broader trade bond with the United States (Pipeline Project – Keystone XL, 2025). However, Edmonton’s economic foundation depends on the energy sector, making it vulnerable to global oil price fluctuations. This affects employment rates and long-term economic growth.

Toronto is Canada’s largest financial center, accounting for 18% of Ontario’s GDP. In contrast to Edmonton’s resource-based economy, Toronto has a highly diversified economic landscape, encompassing the sectors of finance, technology, and manufacturing. The city is home to the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX), serving corporate finance and cross-border investment flows. Furthermore, Toronto’s expanding technology sector attracts global companies, encouraging progress and growth. With trade routes like the Windsor-Detroit crossing handling around $320 million in daily commerce, the city’s strategic location on the U.S. border further reinforces its economic importance (MSU to Host Forum on Importance…, 2024).

From an agricultural and fur trade town, Edmonton has undergone a profound transformation to become Canada’s main oil hub. Originally dependent on wheat and livestock farming, the city sustained local consumption and export through these products. However, the discovery of oil in Leduc in 1947 drastically altered Edmonton’s economic landscape, making it a hub for the petrochemical industry, refining, and oil extraction (CAPP, 2025). Although such a change has generated significant wealth, it has also deepened the city’s reliance on a single industry. Its future development must focus on economic diversification, which heavily relies on U.S. consumption.

Section III: Demographic Change, Immigration Policy, and Cultural Dynamics

Canada holds the status of one of the world’s most accessible immigration systems, consistently granting permanent residency to many immigrants. Citizenship requires at least three years of residency within five years, filed taxes, language proficiency, and a citizenship test (Immigration, 2025). According to the 2021 Census of Population, roughly 8.3 million people, 23% of Canadians, were not born in Canada, making it a significant demographic shift (Government of Canada, Statistics Canada, 2023).

Asian influx remains a challenge. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1923 froze Chinese immigration and stripped Chinese Canadians of civil rights and economic opportunities (Parks Canada Agency, Government of Canada, 2024). This Act was among many other North American exclusionary policies, paralleling the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II as well as the forced displacement of Indigenous communities, such as the Indian Removal Act of 1830 (Japanese-American Incarceration During World War II, 2024). Despite the discriminatory practices, the Exclusion Act remained active until 1947, when Canada transitioned toward a merit-based immigration system, leading to a renewed wave of Chinese migration, particularly among skilled professionals and people in business.

While the United States evolved into a decentralized and intensely diverse federation, stretching from Puritan New England to the Catholic Midwest, and from urban metropolises to frontier ranches, Canada, in turn, developed a more structured form of diversity. Canadian multiculturalism, officially enshrined in policy in the 1970s, promoted a “mosaic” model of integration rather than the American “melting pot.” Immigration to Canada has traditionally been managed through selective, skill-based programs emphasizing economic contributions, resulting in a distinct cultural atmosphere: cautious, administratively supported, and more focused on bilingualism and multicultural coexistence, especially between English and French populations.

The psychological split between the U.S. and Canada is also deeply rooted in their respective nation-building experiences. The United States rejected British monarchical and social traditions through the Revolution and vivid self-reinvention, unlike Canada, which negotiated its independence incrementally, upholding loyalty to the Crown. Consequently, where the American spirit prioritized liberty, the Canadians leaned toward compromise and bureaucratic order.

Canada’s participation in the two World Wars further illustrates its cautious evolution of autonomous national identity. Vimy Ridge in 1917 marked a symbolic military victory, often referred to as the birth of the Canadian nation (Canadian War Museum: The Battle of Vimy Ridge, 2016). Yet, the first and only time that Canada declared war on its own, or in other words, independently of Britain, was during World War II. Even having had a sense of sovereign nationhood, many Canadians today still view their international role through the lens of partnership with Britain rather than individual leadership, exposing Canadian leaders to globalist control.

Modern Canada remains divided by two intellectual traditions: the British imperial legacy and the American spirit of autonomous innovation. The continued existence of a constitutional monarchy, the cultural prestige of British legal, academic, and parliamentary institutions, and persistent emotional ties to Britain, such as royal visits, demonstrate Canada’s lingering imperial reflexes. However, the close location to the United States pressures Canada toward adopting a more individualistic model of political and social life. This ideological dichotomy creates a serious identity tension, where Canada projects itself as an independent actor on a global stage, when in fact, it often navigates between supporting British-rooted institutions and responding to American-style market pressures.

Through its high immigration rates, Canada shows remarkable cultural diversity. About 37% of Edmonton’s population consists of immigrants and a large Indigenous population. Similarly, Toronto’s cultural diversity is highly pronounced, with immigrants making up 46% of the population. In response to the challenges of the language barrier, social integration, and opportunities, the cities set up cultural advisory committees and community projects (Heritage, 2022). The rapid population increase alongside profound shifting demographic patterns worsened situations in infrastructure, housing, and employment, making proactive urban planning increasingly important. In a fundamental manner, it also shapes whether a merger with the United States will be acceptable to all Canadians through a democratic vote.

Section IV: Crime and Border Security
One of the most pressing issues is the intersection of organized crime and immigration. About 7% of Edmonton population is Chinese people who make notable contributions to business, education, and culture. However, transnational crime networks identified and exploited significant gaps in the system due to its economic openness. Sophisticated criminal schemes prompted law enforcement to improve intelligence operations and cross-border collaboration tactics (Wachter, 2024). Toronto faces the same challenges but on a larger scale. With 11.1% of Toronto’s population being Chinese, the city has become a hub for organized crime and money laundering, particularly in the real estate sector. An estimated $5 billion is laundered annually through underground banking and illicit investments (Money Laundering in Canada: More Unknowns Than Knowns | Risk & Compliance Platform Europe, 2020). Although law enforcement and policymakers work on mitigation efforts, the complexity of financial crimes, especially the involvement of foreign actors, makes it a constant uphill battle.

Beyond organized crime, border security poses additional matters of concern. Vast road and rail systems, while essential links for trade, also facilitate smuggling. The Port of Vancouver channels international trade and serves as an entry point for organized crime. Western Canada’s geography and economic position make it a focal point for illicit activities, where drugs, weapons, and human trafficking remain persistent threats, demanding stronger U.S.-Canada cooperation. Human trafficking networks exploit the region’s high immigration rates and temporary worker programs.

Meanwhile, Toronto Pearson International Airport, handling over 50 million travelers annually, is a key transit point for both legal and illicit activities (Toronto Pearsons, n.d.). Smuggling networks exploit the airport’s high traffic, which makes advanced screening and intelligence-sharing with U.S. authorities more critical.

The infamous “Vancouver Model” of money laundering is one of the most critical challenges for both Canada and the U.S. Billions of dollars are laundered through casinos, real estate, and underground banking, with drug profits from U.S. fentanyl and methamphetamine sales funneled through Vancouver’s casinos and transferred back to China, making it a well-designed transnational network.

Paul King Jin, a central figure within the Vancouver model, channeled large-scale money laundering through British Columbia’s casinos, disguising drug money as casino chips and incorporating drug trafficking networks into Canada’s financial sector (Schneider & Saint Mary’s University, 2020). After a nearly six-year investigation into allegations of money laundering, Paul King Jin has never been charged (Mackin, 2023). Furthermore, during this time, Jin had the opportunity to meet with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, heating the discussions on the influence and connections to the political establishment.

The challenges of Western Canada, as well as the overall government structure, keep expanding with the implementation of progressive drug policy. In 2023, British Columbia became the first province to decriminalize the possession of hard drugs, including heroin, fentanyl, cocaine, and methamphetamine (Government Communications and Public Engagement, 2025). Even though the policy is a three-year pilot program, its main intention is to reduce the “stigma” that prevents drug users from seeking treatment. By removing drug possession penalties, the initiative intends to shift the focus from punishment to public health, emphasizing harm reduction strategies such as supervised consumption sites and increased access to addiction services (Fischer, 2023). The results of this decriminalization policy are self-evident, as they fail to address the root causes of addiction, intentionally praising drug addiction and exacerbating public safety.

When experts ask to discuss if Canada and the U.S. can merge their governance and economic systems, it is essential to highlight the Equalization Program. It was established in 1957 to ensure fiscal balance across provinces by redistributing federal funds to the provinces below the national fiscal capacity standard (Department of Finance Canada, 2024). While the Equalization Program was designed to maintain national unity through fair allocation of payments, Western Canada’s economic contributions have fueled debates over its fairness.

Province	Payment Amount (CAD Millions)	Per Capita Payment (CAD)	% of Provincial Revenue
Quebec	$13,316	$1,545	8.9%
Ontario	$576	$38	0.3%
Manitoba	$4,352	$3,109	19.4%
New Brunswick	$2,897	$3,629	21.9%
Nova Scotia	$3,284	$3,252	20.7%
Prince Edward Island	$610	$3,718	19.4%
Newfoundland & Labrador	$218	$412	2.1%
Alberta	$0	$0	0%
British Columbia	$0	$0	0%
Saskatchewan	$0	$0	0%

Figure 2. Equalization Payments by Province.
Graph created by Chat GPT using publicly available data from the Department of Finance Canada (2024).

Despite the grand contributions of resource-rich provinces like British Columbia, Saskatchewan, and Alberta, these provinces do not receive equalization payments (Haltiwanger, 2023). The fiscal capacity cap does not let resource-rich provinces qualify for federal support, which reinforces their resentment. The program unfairly benefits traditionally less industrialized provinces like Quebec and the Maritimes. The overall political sentiment and instability are further intensified by the trade war with the U.S.

Canada’s strengths are clear: Its robust sectors in agriculture, energy, and technology greatly contribute to Canada’s GDP, with increasing investments in sustainability and innovation. Even with economic diversification, however, Canada finds weakness in its dependence on the U.S. for economic trade and opportunity. History downplays disagreement between the U.S. and Canada until recently, when a trade war threatens U.S.-Canada economic relations. In addition, criminal drug trafficking and money laundering, intensified by Canada’s relationship with China, impact the next wave of global competition in the Arctic.

Debates over security have also created distrust. Between 1981 and 2008, data indicate that Quebec’s opinion of the U.S., impacted by French influence, has exponentially declined compared to other Canadian provinces, particularly due to the U.S.’s international actions during the early years of the War on Terror (Anderson & Sands, 2011). As a result of the recent trade war, an online poll of 1,017 Quebec adults, conducted from January 31 to February 2 by the Quebecor media chain, found that 76% of respondents felt “the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House made them less likely to purchase American goods,” while 74% said they were “less likely to visit the U.S.” (Montreal Gazette & Gazette, 2025).

Section V: Arctic Sovereignty and Strategic Future

While economic and immigration challenges dominate southern and urban centers, Canada’s northern frontier introduces a distinct set of vulnerabilities tied to sovereignty and global competition. The shifts of political sentiments towards the U.S. underlines broader concerns that Canada is facing, specifically in the Arctic. The fast-melting Arctic ice offers a changing problem revolving around matters of national security, resource rivalry, and sovereignty. Previously unreachable sources of oil, natural gas, and important rare earth minerals become increasingly feasible for production as Arctic ice recedes.

The Arctic is a geopolitical treasure. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, it contains 30% of the world’s undiscovered natural gas and 13% of the undiscovered oil (U.S. Geological Survey, 2008). This resource potential has increased competitiveness among Arctic countries, involving the United States and Russia. Meanwhile, non-Arctic players like China also act strategically, seizing opportunities to increase influence in a territory formerly deemed too harsh for continuous involvement. For Canada, this means balancing the duty of protecting its northernmost territories against invasion and geopolitical wrangling with massive economic prospects presented by the exploration of the Arctic.

Despite its vast Arctic coastline, Canada has historically exercised minimal control over its northern territories, relying on the symbolic sovereignty of widespread Indigenous settlements. Currently, the fragility of Canada’s northern presence is coming under severe pressure. Russia, in turn, has systematically expanded its Arctic military installations, and the United States, via the purchase of Alaska, has maintained stronger patrol capabilities. Presently, as the Arctic region becomes more accessible due to warmer temperatures, Canada’s relative lack of deepwater ports, icebreakers, and regional military bases leaves it strategically disadvantaged.

Militarily, the future demands more than symbolic gestures. Canada’s Arctic strategy increasingly hinges on modernization programs such as the renewal of North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) infrastructure, the acquisition of new patrol aircraft, and the expansion of Arctic rangers (locally recruited Indigenous forces). While the threat is not immediate but gradual strategic erosion, multiple foreign powers can exploit gaps in surveillance, emergency response, and economic regulation to diminish Canadian control without conflict. Canada’s future position in the Arctic will require a decisive shift from passive stewardship to active, visible presence.

The growing military presence of Russia in the Arctic region has become one of Canada’s most urgent security issues. Russia’s geographic proximity to the Canadian Arctic not only garners global attention but also reshapes regional dynamics to force Canada to reassess its security architecture. If Canada supports the decriminalization of deadly drugs within its borders, it raises questions about its capability to establish a rigorous national defense independently, particularly in the Arctic. Such a lapse in internal policy scrutiny not only weakens Canadian sovereignty but also adds another layer of vulnerability to its national security profile. In addition, this has caused the Trump administration to become more assertive.

China’s Arctic engagement introduces another level of difficulty. China, although, not an Arctic country, has declared itself a “near-Arctic state.” The PRC actively pursues its Polar Silk Road project to increase geopolitical and commercial impact in the area (Brady, 2017). Through investment, the creation of research stations, the development of new infrastructure, and shipping routes, China positions itself as a major actor in the future of the Arctic region. While the Chinese government promotes its Arctic objectives as benign and commercial in character, Canada remains wary about the long-term consequences of this statement. China’s growing presence might threaten Canada’s authority over the Northwest Passage, a strategically important waterway claimed as an internal sea. Other nations, notably the U.S., contend it is an international strait (Conley et al., 2024). The more the economic consideration plays a role in this subject matter, the more likely it is that the conflict will intensify, especially as it incentivizes more international navigation in the Canadian Arctic waters.

Moreover, the melting of the Arctic poses a threat for the area to become a hotly disputed resource battlefield. Since warmer temperatures become frequent, new shipping routes bring a surge of military and economic activity into Canada’s Arctic. The Northwest Passage, once frozen year-round, is progressively more navigable, generating opportunities for global trade but also the potential for territorial conflicts (Griffiths, Huebert, & Lackenbauer, 2011). Whether military, scientific, or commercial, the presence of foreign vessels presents legal and enforcement issues for Canada. Uncontrolled resource allocation might result in environmental damage, challenging Canada’s efforts to uphold regionally sustainable ecological practices and sovereignty.

As a reaction to the escalating security concerns, Canada began reassessing its national defense posture in close cooperation with NATO forces, which expanded its Arctic-oriented military operations, intelligence-sharing activities, and strategic planning (Lackenbauer, 2024). Even though Canada’s initiative shows its dedication to the security of the Arctic region, the current state of affairs still sparks substantial concerns about the long-term trajectory of Arctic geopolitics. Not in the least is the structure of relations with the United States.

Should resource rivalry get more intense, Canada may find itself in the middle of a rising power struggle between the global superpowers. The Arctic region is now transforming into a geopolitical battlefield where international security, economic interests, and environmental issues interact, rather than a far-off and frozen expanse. How Canada responds in the following years will define whether it becomes a major Arctic power or risks losing influence in one of the world’s most strategically important frontiers.

Taken together, these factors will shape Canada’s future capacity to act as a sovereign power. It is essential for American policymakers to analyze the historical connection between the United States and Canada through treaties and partnerships. The foundational differences in governance and policymaking are making Canada face significant internal challenges that undermine its power to assert itself in the global political arena. While the United States has implemented decisive measures on the matters of defense, economy, and order, Canada has often relied on riding U.S. progressive policies that, while beneficial in certain aspects, have created gaps in its long-term political strategy.

Canada’s approach to immigration, drug decriminalization, economic equalization, and national security is struggling to address its vulnerabilities. The growing challenge of independently managing its Arctic border proves Canada’s need for reliance on the United States and other Western actors. It is self-evident that without a firm position on security in financial regulations and transnational crime, Canada risks being forced into greater dependency on external decision makers. The longer these issues fail to receive proper attention, the more fragile the integrity of Canadian sovereignty will become.

References

Anderson, G., & Sands, C. (2011). Forgotten partnership redux. Cambria Press.

Brady, A. (2017). China as a polar great power. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316832004

British North America Act, 1867, 30 & 31 Vict., c. 3 (U.K.). (1867). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/30-31/3/contents

Buckner, P. (2013, July 15). Rebellions of 1837–38. The Canadian Encyclopedia. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/rebellions-of-1837

Canada, G. A. (2025, February 3). The Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). GAC. https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/cusma-aceum/index.aspx?lang=eng

Canada and the American Revolution | Around the World. (n.d.). Museum of the American Revolution. https://www.amrevmuseum.org/canada-and-the-american-revolution-revolution-around-the-world

Canadian War Museum: The Battle of Vimy Ridge. (2016, March 22). Gateway Gazette. https://gatewaygazette.ca/the-battle-of-vimy-ridge-9-12-april-1917/

CAPP. (2025, March 12). CAPP | Canada’s upstream oil and natural gas industry. CAPP | a Unified Voice for Canada’s Upstream Oil and Gas Industry. https://www.capp.ca/

Central Intelligence Agency. (2013). Arctic.svg [Map]. CIA World Factbook. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arctic.svg Cherepuschak, T. (2022, October 28). Canada ethnic origin map 2021 [Map]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canada_ethnic_origin_map_2021.png

Conley, H. A., Melino, M., & Alterman, J. B. (2024). THE ICE CURTAIN: RUSSIA’S ARCTIC MILITARY PRESENCE. https://www.csis.org/analysis/ice-curtain-russias-arctic-military-presence

Cronin, A. (2015, April 17). Untangling North Atlantic Fishing, 1764-1910, Part 3: The Reciprocity Treaty of 1854 | Beehive. https://www.masshist.org/beehiveblog/2015/04/untangling-north-atlantic-fishing-1764-1910-part-3-the-reciprocity-treaty-of-1854/

Department of Finance Canada. (2024, December 23). Equalization program. Canada.ca. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/programs/federal-transfers/equalization.html

Field, M. A. (1992). The differing federalisms of Canada and the United States. Law and Contemporary Problems, 55(1), 107–120. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol55/iss1/5

Fischer, B. (2023). ‘Drug decriminalization’ in Canada: a plea for a nuanced, evidence-informed, and realistic approach towards improved health outcomes. Can J Public Health, 114(6), 943–946. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-023-00809-x

Foot, R. (2006, February 6). Canada East. The Canadian Encyclopedia. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/canada-east

Giráldéz, A., & Richard, A. M. (2023). “Soft Gold” before the gold rush: sea otter pelts in the “Competitive expansion” of merchant capitalism and the creation of a Pacific Ocean economy. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/%E2%80%9CSoft-Gold%E2%80%9D-Before-the-Gold-Rush%3A-Sea-Otter-Pelts-a-Gir%C3%A1ld%C3%A9z-Richard/4bc5a232912d849a69982f6e0e81a33a94705453

Goddeeris, C. (2021, September 23). What is CUSMA? Scoping the impact of the new NAFTA. BDO Canada. https://www.bdo.ca/insights/cusma-nafta

Government Communications and Public Engagement. (2025, March 24). Decriminalizing people who use drugs in B.C. Province of British Columbia. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/overdose/decriminalization

Government of Canada, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, Office of the Deputy Minister, Communications and Marketing Branch & Communications and Marketing Branch. (2021, November 5). Building a nation of innovators. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/innovation-better-canada/en/building-nation-innovators

Government of Canada, Statistics Canada. (2023, October 4). Focus on Geography Series, 2021 Census – Canada. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/as-sa/fogs-spg/page.cfm?lang=E&topic=9&dguid=2021A000011124

Griffiths, F., Huebert, R., & Lackenbauer, P. W. (2011). Canada and the changing Arctic: Sovereignty, security, and stewardship. Wilfrid Laurier University Press. https://www.wlupress.wlu.ca/Books/C/Canada-and-the-Changing-Arctic

Haltiwanger, J. (2023, November 16). Graphic Truth: Show me the money, eh! GZERO Media. https://www.gzeromedia.com/gzero-north/graphic-truth-show-me-the-money-eh

Hall, A. (2007, February 7). Royal Proclamation of 1763. The Canadian Encyclopedia. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/royal-proclamation-of-1763

Heritage, C. (2022, March 7). Annual Report on the Operation of the Canadian Multiculturalism Act 2020-21. Canada.ca. https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/corporate/publications/plans-reports/annual-report-canadian-multiculturalism-act-2020-2021.html

Hogweard. (2020). Political map of Canada [Map]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Political_map_of_Canada.svg Wikimedia Commons

Hydro-Québec. (2014). Annual report 2013. https://www.hydroquebec.com/data/documents-donnees/pdf/annual-report-2013.pdf

Immigration, R. a. C. C. (2025, February 21). Apply for citizenship: Who can apply. Canada.ca. https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/canadian-citizenship/become-canadian-citizen/eligibility.html

Japanese-American incarceration during World War II. (2024, March 22). National Archives. https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/japanese-relocation

Kramer, B. (2024, March 26). How do Canadian legislatures differ from their U.S. state counterparts? MultiState. https://www.multistate.us/insider/2024/3/26/how-do-canadian-legislatures-differ-from-their-us-state-counterparts

Lackenbauer, P. W. (2024). “The most urgent and important task we face”: Framing the Arctic focus in Canada’s April 2024 defence policy update (Briefing Note No. 5). Arctic Yearbook. https://arcticyearbook.com/images/yearbook/2024/Briefing_Notes/BN5_Lackenbauer.pd

Laird, R. (2018, March 29). The Bering Strait: choke point of the future? – Second line of defense. Second Line of Defense. https://sldinfo.com/2015/11/the-bering-strait-choke-point-of-the-future/

Library of Congress. (n.d.). Indigenous Peoples of Québec and Eastern Canada. In Québec:        French Culture, First Nations & Folk Music. https://guides.loc.gov/quebec/indigenous-     peoples

Longley, R. (2020, January 11). What was Jay’s Treaty? ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/jays-treaty-4176841

Mackin, B. (2023, March 1). No charges for Paul King Jin after six-year money laundering investigation. Business in Vancouver. https://www.biv.com/news/economy-law-politics/no-charges-paul-king-jin-after-six-year-money-laundering-investigation-8270751

Maurice, J. (2006, February 7). Province of Canada (1841-67). The Canadian Encyclopedia. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/province-of-canada-1841-67?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations – Office of the Historian. (n.d.). https://history.state.gov/milestones/1830-1860/webster-treaty

MontrealGazette, & Gazette, M. (2025, February 5). Three out of four Quebecers ready to boycott U.S., poll suggests. Montreal Gazette. https://www.montrealgazette.com/news/provincial-news/article732793.html

MSU to host forum on importance of Gordie Howe International Bridge, U.S.-Canada and Michigan-Canada relations. (2024, September 20). MSUToday | Michigan State University. https://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2024/msu-to-host-forum–on-importance-of-gordie-howe-international-bridge

New Brunswick (CAN) Exports, Imports, and Trade Partners | The Observatory of Economic Complexity. (n.d.). The Observatory of Economic Complexity. https://oec.world/en/profile/subnational_can/new-brunswick

Newfoundland Labrador (CAN) Exports, Imports, and Trade Partners | The Observatory of Economic Complexity. (n.d.). The Observatory of Economic Complexity. https://oec.world/en/profile/subnational_can/newfoundland-labrador

Nova Scotia (CAN) Exports, Imports, and Trade Partners | The Observatory of Economic Complexity. (n.d.). The Observatory of Economic Complexity. https://oec.world/en/profile/subnational_can/nova-scotia

Norman-Eady, S. (1998). Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. https://www.cga.ct.gov/PS98/rpt%5Colr%5Chtm/98-R-0143.htm

Parks Canada Agency, Government of Canada. (2024, December 5). Exclusion of Chinese Immigrants (1923–1947) National Historic event. https://parks.canada.ca/culture/designation/evenement-event/exclusion-chinois-chinese

Parliament: An Overview. (n.d.). https://lop.parl.ca/sites/Learn/default/en_CA/ParliamentaryPrimer

Pipeline Project – Keystone XL. (2025, April 14). Alberta.ca. https://www.alberta.ca/keystone-xl-pipeline-project

U.S. Geological Survey. (2008). Circum-Arctic resource appraisal: Estimates of undiscovered oil and gas north of the Arctic Circle (Fact Sheet 2008–3049). U.S. Department of the Interior. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3049/ Lapin yliopiston tutkimusportaali+3Taylor & Francis Online+3Discovery+3

Schneider, S. & Saint Mary’s University. (2020). Money laundering in British Columbia: A review of the literature. In The Cullen Commission of Inquiry Into Money Laundering in British Columbia. https://ag-pssg-sharedservices-ex.objectstore.gov.bc.ca/ag-pssg-cc-exh-prod-bkt-ex/6%20-%20Money%20Laundering%20in%20BC%20-%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20Literature.pdf

Statista. (2024). Real value added to the gross domestic product (GDP) of Canada in 2022, by province (in billion chained 2017 Canadian dollars). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/463307/real-value-added-to-canada-gdp-by-province/

Toronto Pearsons. (n.d.). Pearson Airport. https://www.torontopearson.com/en/corporate/media/fast-facts

Wachter, I. (2024, February 21). Triad money laundering is fueling Canada’s fentanyl nightmare. Neue Zürcher Zeitung. https://www.nzz.ch/english/triad-money-laundering-is-fueling-canadas-fentanyl-nightmare-ld.1814726